Wednesday, 7 December 2011

Apple Conclusion

Since its arrival in 1976, Apple has allowed the world to watch the technology industry grow and expand, multiple times a year.  Founder of Apple, Steve Jobs, a genius in himself, has influenced remarkable devices that have become a common trait within modern day society.  Apple is not only a technological brand, but it has also grown to create a fashion trend in itself, ultimately an incredibly beneficial trait to the conglomerate.  With its aesthetically pleasing devices, highly sophisticated user friendly systems, and the overall marketing image that the company cares for the customer’s needs, it’s no wonder that Apple has become one of the most successful brands of the 21st century. 

Most companies are surrounded by the aura of having their main priority being the profitability factor; however Apple has cleverly avoided this preconception, admittedly adding to its global success.  Another preconception that some have of the company is that they only contribute to the technology industry; however, this may not be the case.  Apple has contributed greatly to all aspects of society, sometimes not as much as people portray, however it has helped technology advance dramatically over the 30 years that it has been around; for example, Apple gave personal computing a personality, with one of the first Macs being brightly coloured, making the device highly enjoyable to use.  It can be said that this is where Apple’s tasteful design addiction began, leading to the iPhone and more.  Apple has also created the best multimedia device, confused the music industry - baffling CEO’s across the globe as it became the world’ s no.1 music store, in 2009 selling 8.5 billion songs – making us all app crazy and reinventing consumer technology.  Although there is this positive image surrounding Apple from its birth, in recent years, it can be commented that many critics and bloggers have begun to publicise the power that Apple holds; and the public are beginning to notice this.

30 years ago, the public were wowed by Apple’s new outlook on the technology business, transforming it from what everyone believed to be a corporate thing, into a lifestyle factor, that everyone could engage in.  In some sense, you could say that the public were quite naïve at this point; because Apple was the first company to create and project this image onto society, it created a fashion trend that many still follow today – myself included.  However, some have become less naïve, and are now aware of the marketing techniques that Apple uses to hook its customers in – the advertisements used by the conglomerate appeal to all members of society, yet their devices are extortionately priced, proving that they contradict themselves, and now the public is aware of this.  Does this mean that Apple will soon lose its grip on the market? Only time will tell, but it is safe to say that with the numerous devices that Apple have released over the past few decades, it has kick-started the a imitation revolution within the technology business, planting the idea in the brains of other corporations that they could gain from Apple’s success by constructing copies of their products.  In recent news, Apple has taken Samsung to court for apparently infringing the patent that concerns the iPad, for creating their own version – the Samsung Galaxy tablet.  Unfortunately for Apple, this is something that must be expected when a company has achieved high status, and although it is fair for Apple to take other companies to court for this form of plagiarism, they have taken part in some petty lawsuits in the past.  Bloggers and critics are part of the package that comes with being a successful brand; they portray their thoughts and opinions on specific products, which most will look upon as being a form of free criticism, one that Apple won’t have needed to pay more money to instigate – yet they do not look upon this as an advantage to their business, so they instead target these people, and sue them.  Is this a plan for Apple to gain more money? Or perhaps this is a way of preserving their clean, untainted image that has proved them well over the years.  By looking into this, it is obvious to comment that Apple hold too much power in the business industry – ultimately creating a monopoly situation.  With this in mind, it is hard for smaller businesses to emerge and remain a part of society, and in this economic climate, this may be just what we need; but the presence of huge conglomerates, Apple, Sony, Panasonic etc. prevents the smaller companies from growing.

Understandably, Apple needs to remain popular with the masses in order to create profit; but it takes advantage of its status within society and sometimes acts as if it is an invincible company.  With the death of Steve Jobs, many believed that the company would struggle to remain on top, and although it is too soon to tell, there have been hiccups in the past few months regarding Siri and the iPhone 5 launch.  With these stumbles, competitors of Apple, like Google, have been given the chance to challenge its role in society.
So what does the future hold for Apple? Will it survive without Steve Jobs? Or will we see some Apple crumple in the future, without Job’s genius outlook on the world? It is hard to comment on this; but what can be noticed, is the innovative and early adapter that Apple is.  It is constantly churning out new ideas and new devices, helping people in their day-to-day lives – however, whether Apple remains the King of the technology world is a comment too soon to say, but for now we can just sit back and watch as the future plays out.

Bono Defends Steve Jobs

U2 singer, Bono, has defended the ex-CEO, Steve Jobs, of Apple Inc. after some recent criticism over the lack of philanthropy that he engaged in, commenting, 

“I’m proud to know him, he’s a poetic fellow, an artist and a businessman. Just because he’s been extremely busy, that doesn’t mean that he and his wife, Laurene, haven’t been thinking about these things.”

Is this something that we should be concerned about?  Should organisations engage in philanthropic activities? This debate of Corporate Social responsibility has been never-ending over years, and leads to the question whether organisations should include a CSR programme within their business.  Nowadays, the public is majorly concerned with where and how the products are made; to tackle this, Apple could consider doing more charitable things for the communities and the employees, such as making their living standards better by pay rise etc. But will they take this into account? The question is, whether Apple believe they need to change this image or not; they could possibly believe they don't need to prove this to anyone, given their position in the market.  Although this is only the beginning of philanthropic criticism, perhaps Apple will jump on this before it possibly escalates in the future. Bono Defends Jobs

Apple Loses Strength


The long lawsuit between Apple and Samsung is finally closing, after months of harsh aqusations from Apple, claiming that the Samsung Galaxy tablet, 

"Samsung has chosen to slavishly copy Apple's innovative technology, distinctive user interfaces, and elegant and distinctive product and packaging design, in violation of Apple's valuable intellectual property rights."
So what does this mean for Apple? Does this show the world that Apple is losing its hold on the technology market? Or, by Apple engaging in legal conduct, does this, in effect, publicise Samsung's "mimic" Galaxy tablet?  Hopefully Apple will now realise that they aren't invincible, and do operate within the boundaries of the law.  The public have the image of Apple, as being the fashionable, trendy company, who are constantly spewing out ideas for devices that will prove beneficial to the customers lifestyle if they purchase it; but it's obvious that Apple's ulterior motive is to gain as much profitability as possible; this situation portrays the ideology that Apple don't want any competition in the technology world, so they can create a larger profit - so does this mean Samsung could soon become the high scorer on the tech leader-board? Apple Loses Its Edge

Tuesday, 6 December 2011

EU Inquisition

It's been reported that the EU is investigating the over-pricing of e-books; this includes Apple, as well as Rupert Murdoch’s Harper Collins and Penguin, which is owned by Britain’s Pearson Group.  


The concerns originate from these conglomerates overpricing the downloads to devices like the iPad, e.g. Apple’s iTunes store currently offers an eBook download of the biography of its founder Steve Jobs for £12.99, whereas Amazon charges £11.97 for the hardback version.  Finally, it seems as though the clasp that Apple has over the public is beginning to break free; hopefully, we may soon see the prices of Apple products reduce dramatically, making the brand more accessible to all areas of the public.  This also proves to Apple themselves that they cannot get away with the overpricing of their products, and may realise now that the public are on to them and will think twice about buying an Apple device in the future.   Over-priced


Saturday, 3 December 2011

Apple TV






Before the death of Steve Jobs, Apple initially began the project 'Apple TV'; the project has been slowly progressing along for many years, producing a first generation version, however there have been rumours in the background, behind the hyped up release of the iPhone 4 and 5, stating that there will be another generation released soon; However Steve Jobs had been quoted before his death, saying that Apple TV will no longer be a hobby for Apple.


Although it hasn't had anywhere near the same amount publicity as the other 2011/2012 devices, this doesn't mean that there aren't those members  of the public that have zoned in on this first generation of the product, who are also highly anticipating its updated arrival.  Unfortunately for these potential customers, Apple TV has slowly disappeared without anyone noticing, and as the Apple blogger, Don Resigner puts it - without a eulogy.  He also comments upon this lack of progress with the Apple TV, which he highly recommends to his subscribers, however, he can't believe the slowly vanishing of the device.  This sort of behaviour from big conglomerates can be annoying for many people.  This blatantly portrays that Apple believes, that due to the fact that they hold a monopoly situation within the technology industry, it justifies this teasing behaviour that they so often create within their publics.  However, I believe that this situation can be looked upon in a positive light; hopefully with Apple's true colours showing within recent lawsuits and news, the general public will realise that Apple isn't all its made up to be.  Saying this, hopefully this will allow smaller, individual companies to emerge in this economic climate, so that smaller businesses will have a chance in the industry.  It's about time that people realise that huge businesses like Apple, who have been around for many years, take advantage of their status and popularity. Blogger

Thursday, 1 December 2011

How Will Apple Cope?




After the death of Steve Jobs, it seemed as though Apple struggled to keep its footing with the following weeks involving the launch of new devices etc.

However, I believe Apple are still struggling to live up to their reputation without Steve Jobs there to back them up; Jobs was a central part to the business, and with all of the hiccups occurring after he passed, it just proves that he was a crucial element to the corporation.  Apple have been engaged in lawsuits, had problems with their devices, along with critics knocking their every move, especially when it came to the launch of the iPhone 5 being postponed until 2012, none of which would have happened if Jobs was still alive...So what does the future hold for the company?  Will we soon see smaller businesses popping up around the world to compete for the title of 'King' in the technology world?

Wednesday, 30 November 2011

"Can't stand the heat, get out of the kitchen"

Looking into Apple's past, it seems as though there is a high amount of material concerning lawsuits that it has imposed against bloggers; a famous incident is the "Think Secret" case, but it looks as if Apple can't take the criticism from frequent Apple bloggers.  


An example of this petty behaviour can be seen across various platforms, including a comment from Apple Critic, Michael Arrington, "I think this is all complete nonsense. If Apple wants to go after the guy that made the Windows Mobile skin that looks like the iPhone, fine. But to bully bloggers who are simply reporting on this is another matter".  I completely agree with this; why would a company even bother trying to reach high status, if it wasn't prepared for the bloggers re-using their material, and placing their own opinions on the products?  Not to mention the criticism it gets from various areas of the media - It's a factor that comes with being a hugely popular conglomerate, and Apple need to get to grips with this issue and think differently about how they react to bloggers.  These people take the time out of their day to evaluate Apple's products and news events, and give constructive criticism, so why can't Apple see the plus side in this, as a free form of criticism, one that they don't have to fork out more money to instigate. Bloggers